Review the film when its operating information changes
A review may be triggered by a revised procedure, a changed site layout, different access arrangements, an incident-learning action, a new audience, new language needs or a change in the way induction is delivered. The responsible HSE or site owner decides the review schedule and whether an existing version can remain in use.
Start with the current approved requirements and compare them with the film. The release date alone does not tell you whether an instruction is still correct. Equally, a film that looks current may contain outdated wording, signs or visual cues.
If the client authority identifies incorrect safety information, it should decide how to control or suspend that version while an approved replacement or interim briefing is arranged. A production company should not decide whether an unsafe instruction may stay in circulation.
Identify the approved master and every version in use
Collect the released film, the editable project if available, source footage, scripts, graphics, subtitle files and the approval record. Record the actual locations where copies are used: induction rooms, site kiosks, a learning platform, shared drives, supplier portals or downloaded presentations.
Make a list of variants by audience, site, language and opening message. A contractor version and a visitor version may share scenes without sharing the same instructions. Confirm the relationship before editing.
Check the availability and permitted reuse of music, stock material, voice recordings, talent appearances and project files. Ownership of a final film does not automatically establish unrestricted rights to every component.
Compare the film with the current approved source
| Element | Question to resolve | Possible action |
|---|---|---|
| Instruction / narration | Does the wording still match the approved requirement? | Retain, rewrite and re-record, or remove on the client authority’s instruction |
| Footage | Does the image still represent the correct equipment, condition and action? | Retain, replace with verified archive footage, or reshoot |
| Map / sign / contact | Is this the currently authorised version for this site? | Replace from the approved reference; check legibility |
| Animation | Does the scene communicate the current instruction without ambiguity? | Revise the relevant scene and review the full sequence |
| Subtitles / languages | Do all versions carry the same approved meaning? | Update from the revised master and have them reviewed |
| Assessment / briefing support | Do supporting questions and materials still match the film? | Refer linked materials to the responsible client owner |
Add a timecode, source revision, owner and status to each item in the working register. Keep the old and new wording available for the reviewer. This helps avoid a small change silently altering the intended instruction.
Choose the smallest complete update
Retain material when it remains accurate, usable and cleared for the intended purpose. Revise graphics or narration when the underlying imagery is still correct. Reshoot when the image itself is wrong, the required action is missing, or the available footage cannot support the new instruction.
A targeted update can be sensible for a changed contact, title or isolated scene. A broader rebuild may be appropriate when the audience, site configuration, language approach or programme structure has changed substantially.
Do not decide from the percentage of footage that can be reused alone. An update that preserves most of the film but leaves the central instruction confusing is incomplete.
| Route | Good fit | Check before choosing |
|---|---|---|
| Targeted edit | A limited number of clearly identified changes | Source files, rights and all affected variants are available |
| Partial reshoot / animation update | Certain actions, places or visual explanations need replacing | New material will connect accurately with the retained sequence |
| Programme rebuild | The audience, structure or operating content has materially changed | The new brief justifies the broader scope and review effort |
Update every surface that carries the instruction
A change may appear in narration, on-screen text, a diagram and several subtitle files. Use one approved master change list and check each affected output against it.
Review translated meaning as well as spelling. Confirm how terms, roles and labels should appear across languages. Then check timing, line breaks, character rendering and readability in the viewing environment.
Where a variant omits a leadership message or uses a different opening, verify the rest against the approved master. Removing an introduction should not reintroduce an older instruction from another edit.
Approve the exported version in its viewing context
The client’s designated authority should review the actual release export. Check the image, narration, labels and subtitles together; a correct script does not guarantee a correct film.
Where practicable, test playback on the intended screen or platform. Check audibility, subtitle size, visible details and any linked learning or assessment material. The client’s induction process determines how understanding and completion are assessed.
PurplePerfect’s role is to help translate approved information into clear audiovisual communication and to manage the agreed production changes. The client’s authorised technical or HSE team approves the safety content and its applicability.
Replace the old version wherever it is used
Create a release list showing the new filename, revision, audience, language, effective date and approver. Send the designated distribution owner an explicit replacement list.
Archive superseded masters with their status clearly marked. Replace old embeds, local kiosk files, shared-drive links and presentation copies identified in the inventory. Tell the relevant facilitators which version is current.
Record any locations that still need confirmation. Completion means the approved version has reached its intended uses and obsolete copies have been handled under the client’s document-control process.
What to send for an update assessment
- The current film and the date or revision of its approval.
- The list of changes and the approved documents supporting them.
- Sites, audiences, languages and versions affected.
- Available source files, footage and usage agreements.
- The required release date and any interim arrangements decided by HSE.
- The technical approver and the owner of distribution.
If you only have the final video, say so at the start. The available files will affect how the update can be produced and priced.
Discuss a safety-video update.
Share the material you have, the people who need to review it and your intended use date.
Discuss a safety-video update ↗